Cultural Group Histories
Cultural
group history is defined by Martin and Nakayama as a history that can help
develop cultural identity within a larger culture or history, but that is often
unrecorded (Martin & Nakayama, 125).
Any culture or identity can be included in this definition. It can include religious, gender,
sexual, race, and ethnicity identities; it can include immigrant, Native
American, homosexual, disabled, and military veteran cultures. Sometimes these cultural group
histories are recorded, but they are often absent or hidden histories that
challenge the grand narrative of a national history (Martin & Nakayama,
134). Cultural group histories can
be difficult to articulate because they have been suppressed in favor of the
dominant culture or ideology.
Gender
identity and gender identity within a cultural group have not always been
included in the mainstream history.
Julia T. Wood elaborates on this point by demonstrating that language
use is indicative of exclusion by its marginalizing effect (Wood, 5). If a historical text does not use
language that is inclusive of multiple genders, the genders that are not
included are assumed to not be important to that history. Krolokke and Sorensen explain that
there are sets of assumptions and stereotypes scholars can introduce to
studying this subject that can seriously influence the course of the research (Krolokke
& Sorensen, viii). When
studying cultural group history from the perspective of gender, preconceived
assumptions dictate our expectations.
The
work of Wood and Krolokke & Sorensen reinforces the need for self-awareness
and sensitivity to intercultural communication experiences. It is important to be aware of
underlying assumptions and omissions in a historic text because those texts
inform our communication experiences.
This awareness will help communicators recognize and appreciate
alternative histories when they are encountered. Being self-aware of historic and personal assumptions about
a cultural group will help to improve your acceptance of a history and
experience that does not match the mainstream. I will try to be more self-aware, especially because gender
assumptions are applied to me and applied by me.
References
Martin,
Judith N. and Nakayama, Thomas K. (2010). Intercultural Communication in
Contexts. 5th
Edition. McGraw-Hill.
Krolokke, Charlotte and Sorensen,
Anne Scott. (2006). Gender Communication Theories
and Analyses: From Silence to Performance. Sage Publications.
Wood, Julia T. (2009). Gendered Lives: Communication,
Gender and Culture. 9th Edition.
Wadsworth.
Great sources! For APA, use (Author(s), Year) format at the end of the sentence. Only use a page number when quoting. Also use italics and initial caps for book titles.
ReplyDeleteVery well developed explanation of cultural group histories and how it fits in with gender identity and history. What seems to be missing is a connection to a specific example either via mediated text or your lived experience. Make sure that you take this great ideas and apply them to one example that demonstrates it.
I agree that awareness of omissions and assumptions in historic text is important to recognize. I too will try to be more self-aware and to look past my own and others' assumptions.
ReplyDelete