Differences-Similarities
Dialectic
http://ntuaft.com/Departments/Research___Communication/PRC504/Research-Based%20Instructional%20Strategies/Ven%20Diagram%201.gif
There are two important principles
that explain the Differences-Similarities Dialectic. First, the similarity
principle says that individuals tend to be attracted to people they perceive to
be similar to themselves (Martin & Nakayama, 2009). Secondly, finding people
who agree with our beliefs confirms our own beliefs and provides us with
cognitive consistency. Cognitive consistency is defined as having a logical
connection between existing knowledge and a new stimulus. Many individuals seek
partners who like the same types of activities and hold the same religious
views as them. Intercultural relationships most often involve individuals that
are opposite in beliefs from eachother. Research has shown that the best
relationships have an equal of similarities and differences between the
partners. It is good to share common values but it is also a great thing to
learn different ways from your partner.
The Differences-Similarities Dialectic explains why “Birds
of a feather flock together” and “Opposites attract” both hold true. Most
people are attracted to individuals are like them, but the best relationships
come together when there is a good mix of similarities and differences. An
example of this in the intercultural communication context would be two
individuals hold a relationship where they are attracted to each other for both
their differences and similarities. For example, the individuals may have
different backgrounds and skin color, but they may both share the same
religion. Many intercultural relationships don’t occur because the individuals
aren’t around other cultures enough or don’t think that it can work out.
Intercultural relationships are often very successful if the two individuals
take the time and get to know someone of a different culture or background.
Learning
about this topic has opened eyes to my life and made me realize I’ve been in
many relationships that follow this same pattern. Both in my friendships and
romantic relationships, it seems like the individuals have a good mix of
similarities and differences from me. My best friend is super talkative and
loud, whereas I’m more quiet and conservative. Although we differ in this way,
we both share the love for our faith and sports. I think this brings a good
balance to my life and shoes me different ways of doing things. This will help
me in my further intercultural communication encounters, because it will help
me realize that differences are okay and often healthy for a relationship. Just
because someone doesn’t like the same things I do or believe in the same
things, doesn’t mean that I can’t be compatible with them. Similarities and
differences combine in a relationship to make it well-rounded and healthy.
References
Martin,
J. N., & Nakayama T. K. (2009). Intercultural communication in contexts
(5th ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Higher Education.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9u2mT047pYA
Great post. I especially liked the section about cognitive consistency and the need of individuals to seek out partners that compliment their own beliefs of the natural world.
ReplyDeleteExcellent explanation of cognitive consistency. I really enjoyed your paragraph 3 on the personal connection.
ReplyDelete