Cultural
adaptation can be modeled in the social science approach through the
anxiety/uncertainty management theory (AUM) (Martin and Nakayama, 2006). This model emphasizes uncertainty
reduction via knowledge gathering.
The gathering of knowledge allows the anxious or uncertain communicator
to better predict and explain the communication styles and behaviors they
encounter. Being able to predict
behaviors and explain diverse behaviors allows for uninhibited communication. AUM theory can be applied to all
instances of cultural adaptation.
William
Gudykunst developed the AUM theory as a specific alternative to uncertainty
reduction (Gudykunst, p.283).
Gudykunst wants to develop a framework for understanding how managing
anxiety and uncertainty in communication leads to effective communication in
intercultural contexts. Schlenker
and Leary suggest that anxiety only exists in communication because the person
has “concerns about the impressions others are forming of them” (Schlenker and
Leary, 1985). This directly
applies to intercultural communication.
A person trying to adapt to a host culture is very concerned about the
impressions they are making, which are largely guided by communication
events. If that anxiety can be
managed, communication will be more rewarding and the impressions being formed
will tend to be more positive.
Once anxiety and uncertainty are managed in new interactions, they can
then be reduced after the communication and relationship foundation is
established.
Schlenker
and Leary explain that people experiencing anxiety in social communication
events will be less self-assertive, try to avoid causing an argument, limit
their self-disclosures, and limit their contributions to the communication
event (Schlenker and Leary, 1985).
Knowing this can help host culture communicators to recognize the
anxiety and uncertainty of the migrant communicator. This will ensure that the host communicator forms
appropriate impressions of the migrant communicator. In a way, this is a form of AUM because the host
communicator will have some anxiety and uncertainty about communicating with a
migrant, though it is probably less than that experienced by the migrant communicator. Managing anxiety and uncertainty in
communication from both sides will result in the most effective intercultural
communication.
References
Martin,
Judith N. and Nakayama, Thomas K. (2010). Intercultural Communication in
Contexts. 5th
Edition. McGraw-Hill.
Gudykunst, William B. (2005). Theorizing About
Intercultural Communication. Ch. 13 “An Anxiety/Uncertainty Management
(AUM) Theory of Effective Communication”. Sage Publications, Inc.
Schlenker, Barry R. and Leary, Mark R. Journal of
Language and Social Psychology. September 1985. Volume 4. Pages 171-192.
Interesting post about the anxiety/uncertainty management model for cultural transitions. How might this apply to you though? I think for the most part it just makes me think about how I would be transitioning and possibly make me more aware of how much I interact and experience anxiety. Perhaps with that knowledge, it is more easy to transition from one culture to another.
ReplyDelete